Compare Cubot X50 vs Cubot S200

Cubot X50 vs Cubot S200 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot X50 with Cubot S200 .
Name	Cubot X50	Cubot S200

Antutu benchmark	212388
CPU	MediaTek Helio P90	MediaTek MT6582
Diagonal size	6.67 "	5 "
Resolution	2400x1080	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	8 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	128 GB	8 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	64 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Single camera
Sensor model	Samsung GW1
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	4500 mAh	3300 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 11
Material	Plastic
Weight	g	g
Dimensions	mm	mm
Price	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot X50: Cubot KingKong Mini 3 - Compare Cubot King Kong 7 8/256GB - Compare Cubot Max 3 - Compare	45.99€ ($49.00) See Details

Cubot X50 vs Cubot S200 : Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot X50’s camera vs Cubot S200 ’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot X50	Cubot S200
Rear camera	64 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model	Samsung GW1
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot X50 vs Cubot S200 : battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot X50 vs Cubot S200 , compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot X50	Cubot S200
Battery	4500 mAh	3300 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot X50 vs Cubot S200 : Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot X50 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 212388 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S200 , which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot X50

6.67 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / Helio P90 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Samsung GW1 / 4500mAh

On Sale Soon

212388

Cubot S200

5 inches (1280x720) / MT6582 / 1Gb / 8GB / 13Mp / 3300mAh

45.99€

$49.00

Cubot X50 vs Cubot S200 : Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot X50 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 389 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S200 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1477 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot X50

6.67 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / Helio P90 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Samsung GW1 / 4500mAh

On Sale Soon

389 / 1477

Cubot S200

5 inches (1280x720) / MT6582 / 1Gb / 8GB / 13Mp / 3300mAh

45.99€

$49.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot X50 and Cubot S200 ? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X50 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 13Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 8Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 3300mAh (a difference of 1200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot X50 (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S200 (advantages)

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot S200 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

Cubot X50 related comparisons

Cubot S200 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 58

Frequent comparisons