0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs IIIF150 R2022

Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs IIIF150 R2022 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Hotwav Cyber X Pro with IIIF150 R2022.

Name Hotwav Cyber X Pro IIIF150 R2022
Hotwav Cyber X Pro IIIF150 R2022
Antutu benchmark 358722 313177
CPU MediaTek Helio G99 MediaTek Helio G95
Diagonal size 6.78 " 6.78 "
Resolution 2460x1080 2460x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 12 Gb 8 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 256 GB 128 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 108 Mp 64 Mp
Camera Triple Camera Four cameras
Sensor model Samsung HM2
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 16 Mp
Battery 10200 mAh 8300 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 13 Android 11
Material Plastics and rubber Plastics and rubber
Weight 380 g 350 g
Dimensions 181.8 x 85.1 x 17.5 mm 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm
  Price 164.90€ ($190.45) See Details 175.94€ ($203.20) See Details

Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs IIIF150 R2022: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Hotwav Cyber X Pro’s camera vs IIIF150 R2022’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 64Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Hotwav Cyber X Pro IIIF150 R2022
Rear camera 108 Mp 64 Mp
Sensor model Samsung HM2
Flash Dual LED flash Four LEDs
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 16 Mp
Flash No No

Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs IIIF150 R2022: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs IIIF150 R2022, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Hotwav Cyber X Pro IIIF150 R2022
Battery 10200 mAh 8300 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 8-9 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 5-6 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 14-15 hours 14-15 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No No

Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs IIIF150 R2022: Antutu benchmark comparison. Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs IIIF150 R2022: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Hotwav Cyber X Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 358722 score points which is 14.54% faster than the IIIF150 R2022, which got 313177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Hotwav Cyber X Pro
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Gorilla glass / Helio G99 / 12Gb / 256GB / 108Mp Samsung HM2 / 10200mAh
164.90€
$190.45
 
IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
175.94€
$203.20
 

Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs IIIF150 R2022: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Hotwav Cyber X Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 589 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 R2022 which got 427, it is 37.94% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1885 vs 1550 (21.61% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Hotwav Cyber X Pro
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Gorilla glass / Helio G99 / 12Gb / 256GB / 108Mp Samsung HM2 / 10200mAh
164.90€
$190.45
 
IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
175.94€
$203.20
 

What is the difference between Hotwav Cyber X Pro and IIIF150 R2022? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav Cyber X Pro (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 14.54% faster in the Antutu test (45545 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 64Mp
  • More battery capacity: 10200mAh vs 8300mAh (a difference of 1900mAh).

Why it is better not to take Hotwav Cyber X Pro (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 30 grams less (350 vs 380).
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.

Hotwav Cyber X Pro related comparisons

IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons