Compare AGM M5 vs Kenxinda 6A
Name | AGM M5 | Kenxinda 6A |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 30188 | 21533 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 | UNISOC SC7731 |
Diagonal size | 2.8 " | 5.5 " |
Resolution | 320x240 | 960x480 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 2 | 2 |
RAM | 1 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 2 Mp | 5 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 2500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 2 G | 3 G |
WiFi | No | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 8.1 | Android 8.1 |
Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
Weight | 173 g | 145 g |
Dimensions | 155 x 64 x 16.2 mm | 147 x 71,3 x 9,2 mm |
Price | 72.94€ ($85.52) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Kenxinda models here
Alternatives to the Kenxinda 6A: |
AGM M5 vs Kenxinda 6A: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AGM M5’s camera vs Kenxinda 6A’s camera, see the difference between the 2Mp sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | AGM M5 | Kenxinda 6A |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 2 Mp | 5 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | No | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No |
AGM M5 vs Kenxinda 6A: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AGM M5 vs Kenxinda 6A, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | AGM M5 | Kenxinda 6A |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
Type | Removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 5-6 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
AGM M5 vs Kenxinda 6A: Antutu benchmark comparison.
AGM M5 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 30188 score points which is 40.19% faster than the Kenxinda 6A, which got 21533. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AGM M5 vs Kenxinda 6A: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AGM M5 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Kenxinda 6A which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AGM M5 and Kenxinda 6A? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M5 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 40.19% faster in the Antutu test (8655 score difference).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM M5 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Kenxinda 6A (advantages)
- Best weight: 28 grams less (145 vs 173).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 5Mp compared to 2Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 960x480 vs 320x240.
Why it is better not to take Kenxinda 6A (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
AGM M5 related comparisons
- Compare Nomu M6 vs AGM M5
- Compare VKworld New V3 vs AGM M5
- Compare AGM M2 vs AGM M5
- Compare AGM M7 vs AGM M5
- Compare Vernee M7 vs AGM M5
Kenxinda 6A related comparisons
- Compare Kenxinda 6A vs YU FLY F9
- Compare Kenxinda W55 vs Kenxinda 6A
- Compare BLUBOO D6 Lite vs Kenxinda 6A
- Compare Kingzone C5 vs Kenxinda 6A
- Compare Kingzone A5i vs Kenxinda 6A