Compare Ulefone Armor 9E vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 223811 | 85634 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | No |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | Omnivison OV16880 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 320 g | 153 g |
| Dimensions | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm | 151.1 x 74.2 x 7.5 mm |
| Price | 341.93€ ($366.46) See Details | 71.58€ ($76.71) See Details |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 9E’s camera vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526)’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 16Mp Omnivison OV16880 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | Omnivison OV16880 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 9E vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526), compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 4-5 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 4-5 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 223811 score points which is 161.36% faster than the LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb, which got 85634. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 9E vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 417 points score in "Single-core" of against the LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb which got 273, it is 52.75% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1531 vs 414 (269.81% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 9E and LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9E (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 161.36% faster in the Antutu test (138177 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 16Mp Omnivison OV16880
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1920x1080.
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 3600mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9E (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 167 grams less (153 vs 320).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 9E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Blackview BV9800 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 9 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6S vs Ulefone Armor 9E
LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526)
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526)
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526)
- Compare LeEco Cool1 vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526)
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526)