Compare Nokia 3.4 vs AGM H3
| Name | Nokia 3.4 | AGM H3 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 140477 | 131884 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | UNISOC Tiger T310 |
| Diagonal size | 6.39 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1440x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 11 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 181 g | g |
| Dimensions | 161 x 76 x 8.7 mm | mm |
| Price | 132.23€ ($143.45) See Details | 117.94€ ($127.95) See Details |
Nokia 3.4 vs AGM H3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 3.4’s camera vs AGM H3’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 12Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Nokia 3.4 | AGM H3 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Nokia 3.4 vs AGM H3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 3.4 vs AGM H3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Nokia 3.4 | AGM H3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No |
Nokia 3.4 vs AGM H3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 3.4 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 140477 score points which is 6.52% faster than the AGM H3, which got 131884. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 3.4 vs AGM H3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 3.4 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 272 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM H3 which got 260, it is 4.62% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1148 vs 1189 (-3.45% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 3.4 and AGM H3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.4 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 6.52% faster in the Antutu test (8593 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 12Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1440x720.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.4 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM H3 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM H3 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 3.4 related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 3.4 vs Nokia 1.4
- Compare Nokia 3.4 vs Nokia C30
- Compare Nokia G21 vs Nokia 3.4
- Compare Nokia 8.1 vs Nokia 3.4
- Compare Nokia 3.4 vs Nokia C1 Plus
AGM H3 related comparisons
- Compare AGM H3 vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM H3 vs AGM H5
- Compare AGM X3 vs AGM H3
- Compare AGM H3 vs AGM A10
- Compare AGM H3 vs AGM A8