0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Nokia 9 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB

Nokia 9 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia 9 with Nokia 3.2 2/16GB.

Name Nokia 9 Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
Nokia 9 Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
Antutu benchmark 292554 78446
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
Diagonal size 5.9 " 6.26 "
Resolution 2880x1440 1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 6 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 128 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera 41 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 12 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4150 mAh 4000 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0 Android 9.0
Material Metal frame and glass case Plastic
Weight 175 g 181 g
Dimensions 155 x 75 x 7,9 mm 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Nokia models here
Alternatives to the Nokia 9:
Nokia 3.4 - Compare
Nokia 3.1 - Compare
Nokia 1 Plus - Compare
128.80€ ($137.40) See Details

Nokia 9 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia 9’s camera vs Nokia 3.2’s camera, see the difference between the 41Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Nokia 9 Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
Rear camera 41 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 12 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Nokia 9 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 9 vs Nokia 3.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Nokia 9 Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
Battery 4150 mAh 4000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 25 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No No

Nokia 9 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison. Nokia 9 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia 9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 292554 score points which is 272.94% faster than the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB, which got 78446. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia 9
5.9" (2880x1440) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 845 / 6Gb / 128GB / 41Mp / 4150mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
6.26 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 429 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
128.80€
$137.40
 

Nokia 9 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia 9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 416 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB which got 167, it is 149.10% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2266 vs 546 (315.02% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia 9
5.9" (2880x1440) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 845 / 6Gb / 128GB / 41Mp / 4150mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
6.26 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 429 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
128.80€
$137.40
 

What is the difference between Nokia 9 and Nokia 3.2 2/16GB? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 9 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 272.94% faster in the Antutu test (214108 score difference).
  • Best weight: 6 grams less (175 vs 181).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 41Mp compared to 13Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 12Mp vs 5Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2880x1440 vs 1520x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4150mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 150mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Nokia 9 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Nokia 9 related comparisons

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.82/5 of 11
Frequent comparisons