Compare Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
| Name | Oppo Reno14 F 5G | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 601773 | 78446 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 |
| Diagonal size | 6.57 " | 6.26 " |
| Resolution | 2376x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX882 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 180 g | 181 g |
| Dimensions | 158.12 x 74.97 x 7.69 mm | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Oppo models here
Alternatives to the Oppo Reno14 F 5G: Oppo A2 Pro - Compare Oppo Reno7 5G CN 12/256GB - Compare Oppo Find N3 Flip - Compare |
126.85€ ($148.50) See Details |
Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Oppo Reno14 F 5G’s camera vs Nokia 3.2’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony IMX882 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Oppo Reno14 F 5G | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX882 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs Nokia 3.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Oppo Reno14 F 5G | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Oppo Reno14 F 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 601773 score points which is 667.12% faster than the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB, which got 78446. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Oppo Reno14 F 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 831 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB which got 167, it is 397.60% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2773 vs 546 (407.88% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Nokia 3.2 2/16GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Reno14 F 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 667.12% faster in the Antutu test (523327 score difference).
- Best weight: 1 grams less (180 vs 181).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony IMX882 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2376x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Oppo Reno14 F 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Oppo Reno14 F 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A56 vs Oppo Reno14 F 5G
- Compare Xiaomi 15T Pro vs Oppo Reno14 F 5G
- Compare Honor 400 vs Oppo Reno14 F 5G
- Compare Xiaomi 15 vs Oppo Reno14 F 5G
- Compare Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A36
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 7 Plus vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C1
- Compare Nokia G21 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia X6 vs Nokia 3.2