Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Vivo V20 SE
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Vivo V20 SE |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 169732 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 |
Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.44 " |
Resolution | 2280x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 4 Gb | 8 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
ROM | 64 GB | 128 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 48 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Triple Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 32 Mp |
Battery | 2500 mAh | 4100 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
Material | Metal | Plastic |
Weight | 139 g | 171 g |
Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 161 x 74.1 x 7.8 mm |
Price | 356.12€ ($384.29) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo V20 SE: Vivo S15e 12/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 8 - Compare Vivo X90 Pro 8/256GB - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Vivo V20 SE: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Vivo V20 SE’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Vivo V20 SE |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 48 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 32 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Vivo V20 SE: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Vivo V20 SE, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Vivo V20 SE |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2500 mAh | 4100 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 8-9 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Vivo V20 SE: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 62.87% faster than the Vivo V20 SE, which got 169732. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Vivo V20 SE: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vivo V20 SE which got 312, it is 60.58% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1377 (44.23% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Vivo V20 SE? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 62.87% faster in the Antutu test (106716 score difference).
- Best weight: 32 grams less (139 vs 171).
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo V20 SE (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4100mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1600mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vivo V20 SE (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Vivo V20 SE related comparisons
- Compare Vivo Y20s vs Vivo V20 SE
- Compare Vivo V20 SE vs Vivo V19
- Compare Realme 8 vs Vivo V20 SE
- Compare Vivo V20 Pro vs Vivo V20 SE
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Vivo V20 SE