Compare Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
| Name | Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 180575 | 148199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.53 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | Sony IMX230 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 198 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 162,3 x 77,3 x 9,6 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price | 169.00€ ($180.77) See Details | 268.96€ ($287.69) See Details |
Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Poco M3’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | Sony IMX230 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 180575 score points which is 21.85% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3WT, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 321 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3WT which got 320, it is 0.31% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1332 vs 1475 (-9.69% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb and Ulefone Armor 3WT? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 21.85% faster in the Antutu test (32376 score difference).
- Best weight: 166 grams less (198 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 21Mp Sony IMX230
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- NFC supports.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 6000mAh (a difference of 4300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10C
- Compare Xiaomi Mi Note 10 vs Xiaomi Poco M3
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M3
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Realme C15
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT