Compare AGM A10 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | AGM A10 4/64Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 89177 | 38695 |
| CPU | UNISOC Tiger T310 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1440x720 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 230 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 168 x 78 x 11.4 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 98.16€ ($112.68) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
AGM A10 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AGM A10’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | AGM A10 4/64Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
AGM A10 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AGM A10 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | AGM A10 4/64Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
AGM A10 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
AGM A10 4/64Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 89177 score points which is 130.46% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AGM A10 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AGM A10 4/64Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 389 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 235.34% faster. In "Multi-core" score 875 vs 603 (45.11% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AGM A10 4/64Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM A10 4/64Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 130.46% faster in the Antutu test (50482 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1440x720 vs 1280x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM A10 4/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 81 grams less (149 vs 230).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4400mAh (a difference of 620mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
AGM A10 4/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9000 Pro vs AGM A10
- Compare Blackview BV5500 Pro vs AGM A10
- Compare Blackview BV9000 vs AGM A10
- Compare AGM A10 vs Blackview BV6300 Pro
- Compare AGM A9 vs AGM A10
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus