Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Blackview BL8000 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 536711 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 512 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN5 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 8800 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 385 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.6 x 17 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Blackview models here
Alternatives to the Blackview BL8000: Blackview BV9800 - Compare Blackview BV4900 Pro - Compare Blackview BV6300 Pro - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Blackview BL8000 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BL8000’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN5 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BL8000 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN5 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BL8000 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BL8000 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BL8000 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8800 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Blackview BL8000 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BL8000 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 536711 score points which is 1287.03% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BL8000 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BL8000 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 816 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 603.45% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2922 vs 603 (384.58% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BL8000 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BL8000 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1287.03% faster in the Antutu test (498016 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung GN5 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 8800mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 3780mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BL8000 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 236 grams less (149 vs 385).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Blackview BL8000 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview BV9900E
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview A80s
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview BV9500
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview BV6800 Pro
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus