Compare Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Name | Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 592177 | 38695 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6753 |
Diagonal size | 6.55 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 4000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
Weight | 185 g | 149 g |
Dimensions | 160 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
Price | 695.54€ ($756.72) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Oppo Reno Ace 2’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Reno Ace 2 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No |
Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 592177 score points which is 1430.37% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 603 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1430.37% faster in the Antutu test (553482 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp Sony IMX471 vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 36 grams less (149 vs 185).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1020mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Reno Ace 2 vs OnePlus 8
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Exclusive vs Oppo Reno Ace 2
- Compare Oppo Find X2 vs Oppo Reno Ace 2
- Compare Oppo Reno 3 Pro vs Oppo Reno Ace 2
- Compare Oppo Reno Ace 2 vs Nokia 1.3
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus