0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.

Name Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 85188 37524
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 5.71 " 5 "
Resolution 1520x720 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 2 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Dual Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 3000 mAh 2800 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0 Android 6.0
Material Plastic frame and glass case Metal and plastic
Weight 161 g 140 g
Dimensions 149×71.3×8.4 mm 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
  Price 85.86€ ($91.84) See Details Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia 4.2’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 4.2 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery 3000 mAh 2800 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 25 hours 20 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 85188 score points which is 127.02% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb
5.71" (1520x720) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 439 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh
85.86€
$91.84
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 175 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 50.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 798 vs 604 (32.12% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb
5.71" (1520x720) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 439 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh
85.86€
$91.84
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 127.02% faster in the Antutu test (47664 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 21 grams less (140 vs 161).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 62
Frequent comparisons