Compare Vivo V30 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
| Name | Vivo V30 | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 879884 | 78446 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.26 " |
| Resolution | 2800 x 1260 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | OmniVision OV50E | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 186 g | 181 g |
| Dimensions | 164.36 x 75.1 x 7.4 mm | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo V30: Vivo IQOO Neo 8 - Compare Vivo X60 Pro+ 12/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 7 12/256GB - Compare |
126.36€ ($148.35) See Details |
Vivo V30 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo V30’s camera vs Nokia 3.2’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp OmniVision OV50E sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo V30 | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | OmniVision OV50E | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo V30 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo V30 vs Nokia 3.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo V30 | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo V30 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo V30 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 879884 score points which is 1021.64% faster than the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB, which got 78446. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo V30 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo V30 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1216 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB which got 167, it is 628.14% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3549 vs 546 (550.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo V30 and Nokia 3.2 2/16GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo V30 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1021.64% faster in the Antutu test (801438 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp OmniVision OV50E compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 50Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2800 x 1260 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo V30 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)
- Best weight: 5 grams less (181 vs 186).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Vivo V30 related comparisons
- Compare Vivo V30 vs Vivo Y100
- Compare Vivo V30 vs Vivo V29
- Compare Vivo V30 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus
- Compare Vivo V30 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
- Compare Vivo X80 vs Vivo V30
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 7 Plus vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C1
- Compare Nokia G21 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia X6 vs Nokia 3.2