Compare Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Hotwav Note 13 Pro
| Name | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | Hotwav Note 13 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 2986033 | 213115 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) | UNISOC Tiger T606 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.6 " |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1612х720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | OmniVision Light Hunter 800 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastic |
| Weight | 206 g | 236 g |
| Dimensions | 160,3 × 74,9 × 8,4 mm | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11s 8/128Gb non-NFC - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro 8/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Poco M5 6/128GB - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Hotwav models here
Alternatives to the Hotwav Note 13 Pro: Hotwav W10 - Compare Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro - Compare Hotwav T5 Max - Compare |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Hotwav Note 13 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra’s camera vs Hotwav Note 13 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp OmniVision Light Hunter 800 sensor and the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | Hotwav Note 13 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Sensor model | OmniVision Light Hunter 800 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Hotwav Note 13 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Hotwav Note 13 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | Hotwav Note 13 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Hotwav Note 13 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 2986033 score points which is 1301.14% faster than the Hotwav Note 13 Pro, which got 213115. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Hotwav Note 13 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 3251 points score in "Single-core" of against the Hotwav Note 13 Pro which got 335, it is 870.45% faster. In "Multi-core" score 10177 vs 1299 (683.45% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra and Hotwav Note 13 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1301.14% faster in the Antutu test (2772918 score difference).
- Best weight: 30 grams less (206 vs 236).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 16Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 1612х720.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5160mAh (a difference of 840mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav Note 13 Pro (advantages)
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Hotwav Note 13 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
- Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Compare Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Compare Xiaomi 15 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Hotwav Note 13 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Hotwav Note 13 Pro vs Hotwav Note 12
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro vs Hotwav Note 13 Pro
- Compare Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Hotwav Note 13 Pro
- Compare Hotwav Note 13 Pro vs Hotwav H1
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 vs Hotwav Note 13 Pro