Compare Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb
Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 148199 | 80388 |
CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 |
Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 5.45 " |
Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1440x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 21 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 10300 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
Weight | 364 g | 150 g |
Dimensions | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm | 146.3 x 70.4 x 9.55 mm |
Price | 267.63€ ($287.69) See Details | 105.00€ ($112.87) See Details |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A’s camera, see the difference between the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 21 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 10300 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 148199 score points which is 84.35% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb, which got 80388. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 320 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb which got 149, it is 114.77% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1475 vs 523 (182.03% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 3WT and Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 84.35% faster in the Antutu test (67811 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 21Mp Sony IMX230 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1440x720.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 6300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 214 grams less (150 vs 364).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 7A vs Xiaomi MI6