UNISOC Tiger T616 vs Allwinner A133
We compared the performance of processors and found out that UNISOC Tiger T616 is better than Allwinner A133 by 307.95%. It has 8 cores at 2 GHz and an Mali-G57MP GPU versus 4 cores at 1.6 GHz with PowerVR GE8300. In the Antutu Benchmark test, UNISOC Tiger T616 results were faster than Allwinner A133 by 251.12%, scoring 227499 points vs 64793 marks. In the 3DMark test, it scored 457 points against 97 , which is 371.13% higher.
Its disadvantage is a TDP of 10W (its competitor has 6W), which means devices based on this chip will heat up more during games and other complex tasks.
In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.
UNISOC Tiger T616 vs Allwinner A133 Benchmarks and Rankings
| Benchmark | UNISOC Tiger T616 | Allwinner A133 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antutu | 227499 | 64793 | 251.12% |
| Geekbench | 1397/381 | 332/98 | 320.78% / 288.78% |
| 3Dmark | 457 | 97 | 371.13% |
UNISOC Tiger T616 vs Allwinner A133 Gaming Performance Test
| Gaming test | UNISOC Tiger T616 | Allwinner A133 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUBG: Mobile | 42 fps | 22 fps | 90.91% |
| PUBG: New State | 35 fps | 11 fps | 218.18% |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 37 fps | 19 fps | 94.74% |
| Fortnite | 17 fps | 0 fps | +Inf% |
| Genshin Impact | 21 fps | 8 fps | 162.50% |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 50 fps | 20 fps | 150.00% |
UNISOC Tiger T616 vs Allwinner A133 Specification
| Processor name | UNISOC Tiger T616 | Allwinner A133 |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | 1/10/2021 | 10/25/2020 |
| CPU Architecture | 2 x Cortex-A75 2GHz + 6 x Cortex-A55 1.8GHz | 4 x Cortex-A53 1.6 GHz |
| Number of Cores | 8 | 4 |
| Clock Rate | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Chip technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| GPU | Mali-G57MP | PowerVR GE8300 |
| The highest TDP | 10 | 6 |
| Memory | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Features | Unisoc modem | |
| Upload Speed (up to) | 150 Mbps | Mbps |