Apple A13 Bionic vs Google Tensor
We compared the performance of processors and found out that Apple A13 Bionic is better than Google Tensor by 7.36%. It has 6 cores at 2.66 GHz and an Apple 4 core GPU GPU versus 8 cores at 2.8 GHz with Mali-G78 MP. In the 3DMark test, it scored 7578 points against 6220 , which is 21.83% higher.
It has a lower TDP of 6W (10W for its competitor), which means that devices based on this chip will heat up less during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modem in Apple A13 Bionic is better, 220 Mbps vs 200 Mbps so you'll get faster Internet service.
In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.
Apple A13 Bionic vs Google Tensor Benchmarks and Rankings
Benchmark | Apple A13 Bionic | Google Tensor | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Antutu | 621163 | 719833 | 15.88% |
Geekbench | 3466/1333 | 3726/1039 | 7.50% / 28.30% |
3Dmark | 7578 | 6220 | 21.83% |
Apple A13 Bionic vs Google Tensor Gaming Performance Test
Gaming test | Apple A13 Bionic | Google Tensor | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
PUBG: Mobile | 60 fps | 60 fps | - |
PUBG: New State | 57 fps | 56 fps | 1.79% |
Call of Duty: Mobile | 60 fps | 60 fps | - |
Fortnite | 56 fps | 30 fps | 86.67% |
Genshin Impact | 54 fps | 35 fps | 54.29% |
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 60 fps | 60 fps | - |
Apple A13 Bionic vs Google Tensor Specification
Processor name | Apple A13 Bionic | Google Tensor |
---|---|---|
Release Date | 9/15/2019 | 10/10/2021 |
CPU Architecture | 2x 2.66 GHz Lighting, 4x 1.6 GHz Thunder | 2 x Cortex-X1 2,8GHz + 2 x Cortex-A76 2,25GHz + 4 x Cortex-A55 1,8GHz |
Number of Cores | 6 | 8 |
Clock Rate | 2.66 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Chip technology | 7 nm | 5 nm |
GPU | Apple 4 core GPU | Mali-G78 MP |
The highest TDP | 6 | 10 |
Memory | 4 Gb | 12 Gb |
Features | Apple modem | Google 5G modem |
Upload Speed (up to) | 220 Mbps | 200 Mbps |