Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
We compared the performance of processors and found out that Apple A14 Bionic is better than MediaTek Dimensity 8050 by 41.47%. It has 6 cores at 3.1 GHz and an Apple GPU A14 GPU versus 8 cores at 3 GHz with Mali-G77 MC. In the 3DMark test, it scored 7592 points against 4538 , which is 67.30% higher.
The chips have equal TDP of 6W, which means that devices based on these CPUs will heat up the same during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modem in Apple A14 Bionic is better, 314 Mbps vs 300 Mbps so you'll get faster Internet service.
In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 Benchmarks and Rankings
Benchmark | Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Antutu | 665733 | 667536 | 0.27% |
Geekbench | 4211/1592 | 3199/952 | 31.63% / 67.23% |
3Dmark | 7592 | 4538 | 67.30% |
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 Gaming Performance Test
Gaming test | Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
PUBG: Mobile | 60 fps | 60 fps | - |
PUBG: New State | 60 fps | 60 fps | - |
Call of Duty: Mobile | 60 fps | 60 fps | - |
Fortnite | 60 fps | 30 fps | 100.00% |
Genshin Impact | 60 fps | 51 fps | 17.65% |
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 60 fps | 60 fps | - |
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 Specification
Processor name | Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 |
---|---|---|
Release Date | 9/25/2020 | 05/09/2023 |
CPU Architecture | 2x Firestorm 3.1GHz + 4x Icestorm 1.8GHz | 4 x Cortex-A78 3GHz + 4 x Cortex-A55 2GHz |
Number of Cores | 6 | 8 |
Clock Rate | 3.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
Chip technology | 5 nm | 6 nm |
GPU | Apple GPU A14 | Mali-G77 MC |
The highest TDP | 6 | 6 |
Memory | 6 Gb | 16 Gb |
Features | Apple modem | Mediatek 5G modem |
Upload Speed (up to) | 314 Mbps | 300 Mbps |