MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs UNISOC T765
We compared the performance of processors and found out that MediaTek Dimensity 800U is better than UNISOC T765 by 6.03%. It has 8 cores at 2.4 GHz and an Arm Mali-G57 GPU versus 8 cores at 2.3 GHz with Mali-G57 MC. In the 3DMark test, it scored 1602 points against 1099 , which is 45.77% higher.
Its disadvantage is a TDP of 10W (its competitor has 8W), which means devices based on this chip will heat up more during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modem in UNISOC T765 is better, 250 Mbps vs 211 Mbps so you'll get faster Internet service.
In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs UNISOC T765 Benchmarks and Rankings
Benchmark | MediaTek Dimensity 800U | UNISOC T765 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Antutu | 337553 | 388794 | 15.18% |
Geekbench | 1911/612 | 1968/648 | 2.98% / 5.88% |
3Dmark | 1602 | 1099 | 45.77% |
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs UNISOC T765 Gaming Performance Test
Gaming test | MediaTek Dimensity 800U | UNISOC T765 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
PUBG: Mobile | 46 fps | 50 fps | 8.70% |
PUBG: New State | 41 fps | 44 fps | 7.32% |
Call of Duty: Mobile | 50 fps | 54 fps | 8.00% |
Fortnite | 29 fps | 24 fps | 20.83% |
Genshin Impact | 35 fps | 31 fps | 12.90% |
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 59 fps | 55 fps | 7.27% |
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs UNISOC T765 Specification
Processor name | MediaTek Dimensity 800U | UNISOC T765 |
---|---|---|
Release Date | 8/15/2020 | 01/15/2024 |
CPU Architecture | 2x Cortex-A76 (2.4 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A55 (2 GHz) | 2x Cortex-A76 2,3 GHz + 6x Cortex-A55 2,1 GHz |
Number of Cores | 8 | 8 |
Clock Rate | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Chip technology | 7 nm | 6 nm |
GPU | Arm Mali-G57 | Mali-G57 MC |
The highest TDP | 10 | 8 |
Memory | 12 Gb | 12 Gb |
Features | MediaTek modem | UNISOC 5G modem |
Upload Speed (up to) | 211 Mbps | 250 Mbps |