MediaTek MT6737 vs UNISOC SC9832E
We compared the performance of processors and found out that MediaTek MT6737 is better than UNISOC SC9832E by 10.25%. It has 4 cores at 1.3 GHz and an Mali T720MP GPU versus 4 cores at 1.3 GHz with Mali-T820 MP. In the Antutu Benchmark test, MediaTek MT6737 results were faster than UNISOC SC9832E by 44.47%, scoring 41077 points vs 28433 marks.
Its disadvantage is a TDP of 7W (its competitor has 3W), which means devices based on this chip will heat up more during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modems is identical (50 Mbps), so you won't notice a difference in your Internet connection.
In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.
MediaTek MT6737 vs UNISOC SC9832E Benchmarks and Rankings
| Benchmark | MediaTek MT6737 | UNISOC SC9832E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antutu | 41077 | 28433 | 44.47% |
| Geekbench | 441/127 | 422/138 | 4.50% / 8.66% |
| 3Dmark | 69 | 69 | - |
MediaTek MT6737 vs UNISOC SC9832E Gaming Performance Test
| Gaming test | MediaTek MT6737 | UNISOC SC9832E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUBG: Mobile | 22 fps | 27 fps | 22.73% |
| PUBG: New State | 13 fps | 21 fps | 61.54% |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 25 fps | 26 fps | 4.00% |
| Fortnite | 0 fps | 5 fps | +Inf% |
| Genshin Impact | 5 fps | 5 fps | - |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 25 fps | 28 fps | 12.00% |
MediaTek MT6737 vs UNISOC SC9832E Specification
| Processor name | MediaTek MT6737 | UNISOC SC9832E |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | 05/23/2016 | 10/15/2018 |
| CPU Architecture | 4 x Cortex-A53 1,3 GHz | 4 x Cortex-A53 1.3 Ghz |
| Number of Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Clock Rate | 1.3 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Chip technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| GPU | Mali T720MP | Mali-T820 MP |
| The highest TDP | 7 | 3 |
| Memory | 3 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Features | MediaTek modem | UNISOC modem |
| Upload Speed (up to) | 50 Mbps | 50 Mbps |