0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022

Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Hotwav CYBER 7 5G with IIIF150 R2022.

Name Hotwav CYBER 7 5G IIIF150 R2022
Hotwav CYBER 7 5G IIIF150 R2022
Antutu benchmark 327933 313177
CPU MediaTek Dimensity 700 MediaTek Helio G95
Diagonal size 6.3 " 6.78 "
Resolution 2340x1080 2460x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 8 Gb 8 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 128 GB 128 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 64 Mp
Camera Four cameras Four cameras
Sensor model Samsung GM1
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 16 Mp
Battery 8280 mAh 8300 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 11
Material Plastics and rubber Plastics and rubber
Weight 337 g 350 g
Dimensions 168 × 81 × 17 mm 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm
  Price 167.34€ ($179.35) See Details 189.60€ ($203.20) See Details

Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Hotwav CYBER 7 5G’s camera vs IIIF150 R2022’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor and the 64Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Hotwav CYBER 7 5G IIIF150 R2022
Rear camera 48 Mp 64 Mp
Sensor model Samsung GM1
Flash Dual LED flash Four LEDs
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 16 Mp
Flash No No

Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Hotwav CYBER 7 5G IIIF150 R2022
Battery 8280 mAh 8300 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 8-9 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 5-6 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 14-15 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No No

Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: Antutu benchmark comparison. Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Hotwav CYBER 7 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 327933 score points which is 4.71% faster than the IIIF150 R2022, which got 313177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Hotwav CYBER 7 5G
6.3 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Dimensity 700 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp Samsung GM1 / 8280mAh
167.34€
$179.35
 
IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
189.60€
$203.20
 

Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Hotwav CYBER 7 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 541 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 R2022 which got 427, it is 26.70% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1786 vs 1550 (15.23% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Hotwav CYBER 7 5G
6.3 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Dimensity 700 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp Samsung GM1 / 8280mAh
167.34€
$179.35
 
IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
189.60€
$203.20
 

What is the difference between Hotwav CYBER 7 5G and IIIF150 R2022? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav CYBER 7 5G (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 4.71% faster in the Antutu test (14756 score difference).
  • Best weight: 13 grams less (337 vs 350).
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 16Mp .

Why it is better not to take Hotwav CYBER 7 5G (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 48Mp Samsung GM1
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 2340x1080.
  • More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 8280mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.

Hotwav CYBER 7 5G related comparisons

IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.25/5 of 4
Frequent comparisons