Compare AGM M2 vs Phicomm X100W
| Name | AGM M2 | Phicomm X100W |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | ||
| CPU | UNISOC 6531D | |
| Diagonal size | 2.4 " | " |
| Resolution | 320x240 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
| RAM | Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | |
| ROM | GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | |
| Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
| Battery | 1950 mAh | 2000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 2 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | No | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | ||
| Notifications Led | No | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
| Operating system (OS) | ||
| Material | Plastics and rubber | |
| Weight | 138 g | g |
| Dimensions | 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm | mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM M6 - Compare AGM A9 4/64Gb - Compare AGM X3 8/64Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Phicomm models here
Alternatives to the Phicomm X100W: |
AGM M2 vs Phicomm X100W: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AGM M2’s camera vs Phicomm X100W’s camera, see the difference between the 1.3Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | AGM M2 | Phicomm X100W |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | No | |
| Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
| Flash |
AGM M2 vs Phicomm X100W: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AGM M2 vs Phicomm X100W, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | AGM M2 | Phicomm X100W |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 1950 mAh | 2000 mAh |
| Type | Removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | |
| Talk time | 25 hours | |
| Fast charging | No | |
| Wireless charging |
AGM M2 vs Phicomm X100W: Antutu benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 0 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Phicomm X100W, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AGM M2 vs Phicomm X100W: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Phicomm X100W which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AGM M2 and Phicomm X100W? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Phicomm X100W (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 1.3Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 320x240.
- More battery capacity: 2000mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 50mAh).
Why it is better not to take Phicomm X100W (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
AGM M2 related comparisons
- Compare Rover X9 vs AGM M2
- Compare Suppu X6000 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Diamond Z2 vs AGM M2
- Compare BLUBOO Mini vs AGM M2
- Compare Uniwa V708 vs AGM M2
Phicomm X100W related comparisons
- Compare Doogee X7 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Doogee X7 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 4A
- Compare Xiaomi Mi A1 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Meizu M6S
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Xiaomi Mi5