Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot GT95

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot GT95 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Pocket with Cubot GT95.
Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot GT95

Antutu benchmark	137655
CPU	UNISOC Tiger T310	MediaTek MT6572W
Diagonal size	4 "	4 "
Resolution	1080x540	800x480
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	4 Gb	0.5 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	64 GB	4 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	16 Mp	5 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	0.3 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	1350 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 11
Material	Plastic
Weight	149 g	g
Dimensions	119 x 58 x 12.5 mm	mm
Price	75.54€ ($87.24) See Details	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot GT95: Cubot S200 - Compare Cubot P30 - Compare Cubot KingKong Power - Compare

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot GT95: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket’s camera vs Cubot GT95’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot GT95
Rear camera	16 Mp	5 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	0.3 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot GT95: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket vs Cubot GT95, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot GT95
Battery	3000 mAh	1350 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	7-8 hours
Talk time	25 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot GT95: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 137655 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot GT95, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

75.54€

$87.24

137655

Cubot GT95

4" (800x480) / MT6572W / 0.5Gb / 4GB / 5Mp / 1350mAh

51.96€

$60.01

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot GT95: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 295 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot GT95 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1012 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

75.54€

$87.24

295 / 1012

Cubot GT95

4" (800x480) / MT6572W / 0.5Gb / 4GB / 5Mp / 1350mAh

51.96€

$60.01

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot Pocket and Cubot GT95? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 5Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 0.3Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 1080x540 vs 800x480.
More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 1350mAh (a difference of 1650mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot GT95 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Cubot GT95 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot Pocket related comparisons

Cubot GT95 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons