0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Cubot X50 vs UMIDIGI F3

Cubot X50 vs UMIDIGI F3 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot X50 with UMIDIGI F3.

Name Cubot X50 UMIDIGI F3
Cubot X50 UMIDIGI F3
Antutu benchmark 212388 183288
CPU MediaTek Helio P90 MediaTek Helio P70
Diagonal size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 2400x1080 1650x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 8 Gb 8 Gb
Bezel-less Yes Yes
ROM 128 GB 128 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 64 Mp 48 Mp
Camera Four cameras Triple Camera
Sensor model Samsung GW1 Sony IMX582
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 16 Mp
Battery 4500 mAh 5150 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 11
Material Plastic Plastic frame and glass case
Weight g 195 g
Dimensions mm 168,3 x 76,6 x 8,75 mm
  Price Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot X50:
Cubot P40 - Compare
Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro - Compare
Cubot Pocket 3 - Compare
126.62€ ($145.59) See Details

Cubot X50 vs UMIDIGI F3: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot X50’s camera vs UMIDIGI F3’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Cubot X50 UMIDIGI F3
Rear camera 64 Mp 48 Mp
Sensor model Samsung GW1 Sony IMX582
Flash Dual LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 16 Mp
Flash No No

Cubot X50 vs UMIDIGI F3: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot X50 vs UMIDIGI F3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Cubot X50 UMIDIGI F3
Battery 4500 mAh 5150 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging No Yes
Wireless charging No No

Cubot X50 vs UMIDIGI F3: Antutu benchmark comparison. Cubot X50 vs UMIDIGI F3: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot X50 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 212388 score points which is 15.88% faster than the UMIDIGI F3, which got 183288. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot X50
6.67 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / Helio P90 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Samsung GW1 / 4500mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
UMIDIGI F3
6.7 inches (1650x720) Curved Glass / Helio P70 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp Sony IMX582 / 5150mAh
126.62€
$145.59
 

Cubot X50 vs UMIDIGI F3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot X50 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 389 points score in "Single-core" of against the UMIDIGI F3 which got 298, it is 30.54% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1477 vs 1398 (5.65% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot X50
6.67 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / Helio P90 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Samsung GW1 / 4500mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
UMIDIGI F3
6.7 inches (1650x720) Curved Glass / Helio P70 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp Sony IMX582 / 5150mAh
126.62€
$145.59
 

What is the difference between Cubot X50 and UMIDIGI F3? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X50 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 15.88% faster in the Antutu test (29100 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 48Mp Sony IMX582
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 16Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1650x720.

Why it is better not to take Cubot X50 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support
  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the UMIDIGI F3 (advantages)

  • More battery capacity: 5150mAh vs 4500mAh (a difference of 650mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take UMIDIGI F3 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.

Cubot X50 related comparisons

UMIDIGI F3 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 58
Frequent comparisons