Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 367366 | 147114 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.09 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Sony IMX586 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 15000 mAh | 4030 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal frame and glass case |
| Weight | 465 g | 174 g |
| Dimensions | 176.4 x 81.8 x 19.9 mm | 153.5 x 71.9 x 8.5 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all IIIF150 models here
Alternatives to the IIIF150 B2 Ultra: IIIF150 R2022 - Compare IIIF150 B1 Pro - Compare IIIF150 B3 Pro - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb: Xiaomi Redmi K60 8/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Poco F4 6/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Poco F5 8/256GB - Compare |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 B2 Ultra’s camera vs Xiaomi CC9e’s camera, see the difference between the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor and the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Sony IMX586 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Xiaomi CC9e, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 15000 mAh | 4030 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 367366 score points which is 149.72% faster than the Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb, which got 147114. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 595 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb which got 310, it is 91.94% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1921 vs 1340 (43.36% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 B2 Ultra and Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B2 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 149.72% faster in the Antutu test (220252 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 48Mp Sony IMX586
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 1560x720.
- More battery capacity: 15000mAh vs 4030mAh (a difference of 10970mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B2 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 291 grams less (174 vs 465).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B2 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B1 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 Raptor
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 R2022
Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Mi A3 vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Lenovo Z6 Youth vs Xiaomi CC9e