Compare Nokia 2.3 vs HTM LANDVO L800
Name | Nokia 2.3 | HTM LANDVO L800 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 69311 | |
CPU | MediaTek Helio A22 | |
Diagonal size | 6.2 " | " |
Resolution | 1520x720 | |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
RAM | 2 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | |
ROM | 32 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 4000 mAh | mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | No | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | |
Material | Plastic | |
Weight | 183 g | g |
Dimensions | 157.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm | mm |
Price | 116.60€ ($124.38) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all HTM models here
Alternatives to the HTM LANDVO L800: |
Nokia 2.3 vs HTM LANDVO L800: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 2.3’s camera vs HTM LANDVO L800’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Nokia 2.3 | HTM LANDVO L800 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Nokia 2.3 vs HTM LANDVO L800: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 2.3 vs HTM LANDVO L800, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Nokia 2.3 | HTM LANDVO L800 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4000 mAh | mAh |
Type | Non-removable | |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | |
Talk time | 25 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging | No |
Nokia 2.3 vs HTM LANDVO L800: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 2.3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 69311 score points which is 100.00% faster than the HTM LANDVO L800, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 2.3 vs HTM LANDVO L800: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 2.3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the HTM LANDVO L800 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 2.3 and HTM LANDVO L800? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.3 (advantages)
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.3 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the HTM LANDVO L800 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take HTM LANDVO L800 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Nokia 2.3 related comparisons
- Compare Lenovo A7 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare OUKITEL C19 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Nokia 6.1 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Ulefone Note 9 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Cubot J9 vs Nokia 2.3
HTM LANDVO L800 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs OUKITEL U20 Plus
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs OUKITEL U20 Plus
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Doogee X5 Max Pro
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus