0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Sharp Aquos R2 Compact with Google Pixel 3a.

Name Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Google Pixel 3a
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Google Pixel 3a
Antutu benchmark 276448 176653
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
Diagonal size 5.2 " 5.6 "
Resolution 2280x1080 2220x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 4 Gb 4 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 64 GB 64 GB
External memory No No
Rear camera 22.6 Mp 12 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX363
dxomark mobile ranking 101
dxomark (photo) 104
dxomark (video) 95
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Battery 2500 mAh 3000 mAh
Wireless charging Yes No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0 Android 11
Material Metal Plastic
Weight 139 g 147 g
Dimensions 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm 151.3 x 70,1 x 8,2 mm
  Price 345.80€ ($376.57) See Details 182.74€ ($199.00) See Details

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Google Pixel 3a’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 12Mp Sony IMX363 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Google Pixel 3a
Rear camera 22.6 Mp 12 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX363
Flash LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Flash No No

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Google Pixel 3a
Battery 2500 mAh 3000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode 5-6 hours 6-7 hours
Talk time 25 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging Yes No

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a: Antutu benchmark comparison. Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 56.49% faster than the Google Pixel 3a, which got 176653. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
5.2" (2280x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 845 / 4Gb / 64GB / 22.6Mp / 2500mAh
345.80€
$376.57
 
Google Pixel 3a
5.6" (2220x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 670 / 4Gb / 64GB / 12Mp Sony IMX363 / 3000mAh
182.74€
$199.00
 

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Google Pixel 3a which got 342, it is 46.49% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1211 (64.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
5.2" (2280x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 845 / 4Gb / 64GB / 22.6Mp / 2500mAh
345.80€
$376.57
 
Google Pixel 3a
5.6" (2220x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 670 / 4Gb / 64GB / 12Mp Sony IMX363 / 3000mAh
182.74€
$199.00
 

What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Google Pixel 3a? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 56.49% faster in the Antutu test (99795 score difference).
  • Best weight: 8 grams less (139 vs 147).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 12Mp Sony IMX363
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 2220x1080.
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have wireless charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Google Pixel 3a (advantages)

  • More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 500mAh).

Why it is better not to take Google Pixel 3a (disadvantages)

  • Does not have water resistant supports.
  • Does not have wireless charging support.

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons

Google Pixel 3a related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.39/5 of 36
Frequent comparisons