Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 263117 | 148199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.47 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Five cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | Sony IMX230 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5260 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 208 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 157.8 x 74.2 x 9.7 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price | 402.16€ ($430.09) See Details | 269.01€ ($287.69) See Details |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi CC9 Pro’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | Sony IMX230 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5260 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 263117 score points which is 77.54% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3WT, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 549 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3WT which got 320, it is 71.56% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1771 vs 1475 (20.07% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb and Ulefone Armor 3WT? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 77.54% faster in the Antutu test (114918 score difference).
- Best weight: 156 grams less (208 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX compared to 21Mp Sony IMX230
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 5260mAh (a difference of 5040mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Huawei Honor 10X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Max vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT