Compare Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs IIIF150 R2022
| Name | Xiaomi POCO C75 5G | IIIF150 R2022 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 381441 | 313177 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 | MediaTek Helio G95 |
| Diagonal size | 6.88 " | 6.78 " |
| Resolution | 1650x720 | 2460x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 205 g | 350 g |
| Dimensions | 171.88 x 77.8 x 8.22 mm | 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi POCO C75 5G: Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro 12/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 12/256Gb - Compare Xiaomi Poco X4 GT 8/128GB - Compare |
173.33€ ($203.20) See Details |
Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi POCO C75 5G’s camera vs IIIF150 R2022’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp sensor and the 64Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi POCO C75 5G | IIIF150 R2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | Four LEDs |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs IIIF150 R2022, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi POCO C75 5G | IIIF150 R2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi POCO C75 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 381441 score points which is 21.80% faster than the IIIF150 R2022, which got 313177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi POCO C75 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 842 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 R2022 which got 427, it is 97.19% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1901 vs 1550 (22.65% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi POCO C75 5G and IIIF150 R2022? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi POCO C75 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 21.80% faster in the Antutu test (68264 score difference).
- Best weight: 145 grams less (205 vs 350).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi POCO C75 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 50Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1650x720.
- More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 5160mAh (a difference of 3140mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi POCO C75 5G related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M5
- Compare Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M5s
- Compare Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons
- Compare F150 R2022 vs OUKITEL WP17
- Compare F150 R2022 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
- Compare F150 R2022 vs F150 H2022
- Compare F150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT