Compare Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022
| Name | Hotwav CYBER 7 5G | IIIF150 R2022 | 
|---|---|---|
                          
                         | 
                
                    
                          
                         | 
                
            |
| Antutu benchmark | 327933 | 313177 | 
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 700 | MediaTek Helio G95 | 
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 6.78 " | 
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2460x1080 | 
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 | 
| RAM | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | 
| Bezel-less | No | No | 
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB | 
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | 
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 64 Mp | 
| Camera | Four cameras | Four cameras | 
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp | 
| Battery | 8280 mAh | 8300 mAh | 
| Wireless charging | No | No | 
| Network | 4 G | 4 G | 
| WiFi | Yes | Yes | 
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes | 
| NFC | Yes | Yes | 
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | 
| Notifications Led | Yes | No | 
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes | 
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 11 | 
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber | 
| Weight | 337 g | 350 g | 
| Dimensions | 168 × 81 × 17 mm | 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm | 
| Price | 155.71€ ($179.35) See Details | 176.41€ ($203.20) See Details | 
Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Hotwav CYBER 7 5G’s camera vs IIIF150 R2022’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor and the 64Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Hotwav CYBER 7 5G | IIIF150 R2022 | 
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 64 Mp | 
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Four LEDs | 
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp | 
| Flash | No | No | 
Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Hotwav CYBER 7 5G | IIIF150 R2022 | 
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8280 mAh | 8300 mAh | 
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable | 
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days | 
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days | 
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours | 
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours | 
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes | 
| Wireless charging | No | No | 
                        
 
                        Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: Antutu benchmark comparison.
                    
                Hotwav CYBER 7 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 327933 score points which is 4.71% faster than the IIIF150 R2022, which got 313177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs IIIF150 R2022: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Hotwav CYBER 7 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 541 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 R2022 which got 427, it is 26.70% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1786 vs 1550 (15.23% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Hotwav CYBER 7 5G and IIIF150 R2022? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav CYBER 7 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 4.71% faster in the Antutu test (14756 score difference).
 - Best weight: 13 grams less (337 vs 350).
 - Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 16Mp .
 
Why it is better not to take Hotwav CYBER 7 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
 
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 48Mp Samsung GM1
 - Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 2340x1080.
 - More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 8280mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
 - Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
 
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
 - Have water resistant supports.
 - Have fast charging supports.
 
Hotwav CYBER 7 5G related comparisons
- Compare Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro
 - Compare Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs Hotwav CYBER 8
 - Compare Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs Hotwav Note 12
 - Compare Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs Ulefone Armor 12
 - Compare UMIDIGI Bison GT2 Pro 5G vs Hotwav CYBER 7 5G
 
IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons
- Compare F150 R2022 vs OUKITEL WP17
 - Compare F150 R2022 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
 - Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
 - Compare F150 R2022 vs F150 H2022
 - Compare F150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT