Compare Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Xiaomi Mi CC11 | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 505499 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.43 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | No |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4360 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal |
| Weight | g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Mi CC11: Xiaomi Poco X4 GT 8/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 6/64Gb - Compare |
314.60€ ($359.43) See Details |
Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Mi CC11’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Mi CC11 | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Mi CC11 | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4360 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Mi CC11 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 505499 score points which is 82.86% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Mi CC11 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 856 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 70.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2166 vs 1986 (9.06% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Mi CC11 and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Mi CC11 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 82.86% faster in the Antutu test (229051 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4360mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1860mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Mi CC11 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Mi CC11 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G vs Xiaomi Mi CC11
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi CC11
- Compare Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro vs Xiaomi Mi CC11
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact