MediaTek Helio G85 vs UNISOC Tiger T616
We compared the performance of processors and found out that MediaTek Helio G85 is better than UNISOC Tiger T616 by 13.19%. It has 8 cores at 2 GHz and an Mali-G52 MC2 GPU versus 8 cores at 2 GHz with Mali-G57MP. In the 3DMark test, it scored 714 points against 457 , which is 56.24% higher.
It has a lower TDP of 5W (10W for its competitor), which means that devices based on this chip will heat up less during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modem in UNISOC Tiger T616 is better, 150 Mbps vs 100 Mbps so you'll get faster Internet service.
In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.
MediaTek Helio G85 vs UNISOC Tiger T616 Benchmarks and Rankings
| Benchmark | MediaTek Helio G85 | UNISOC Tiger T616 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antutu | 215224 | 227499 | 5.70% |
| Geekbench | 1369/396 | 1397/381 | 2.05% / 3.94% |
| 3Dmark | 714 | 457 | 56.24% |
MediaTek Helio G85 vs UNISOC Tiger T616 Gaming Performance Test
| Gaming test | MediaTek Helio G85 | UNISOC Tiger T616 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUBG: Mobile | 46 fps | 42 fps | 9.52% |
| PUBG: New State | 36 fps | 35 fps | 2.86% |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 45 fps | 37 fps | 21.62% |
| Fortnite | 21 fps | 17 fps | 23.53% |
| Genshin Impact | 19 fps | 21 fps | 10.53% |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 48 fps | 50 fps | 4.17% |
MediaTek Helio G85 vs UNISOC Tiger T616 Specification
| Processor name | MediaTek Helio G85 | UNISOC Tiger T616 |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | 4/30/2020 | 1/10/2021 |
| CPU Architecture | 2x Cortex-A75 (2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A55 (1.8 GHz) | 2 x Cortex-A75 2GHz + 6 x Cortex-A55 1.8GHz |
| Number of Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Clock Rate | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Chip technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57MP |
| The highest TDP | 5 | 10 |
| Memory | 8 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Features | MediaTek modem | Unisoc modem |
| Upload Speed (up to) | 100 Mbps | 150 Mbps |