Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200
We compared the performance of processors and found out that Apple A14 Bionic is better than Samsung Exynos 2200 by 4.61%. It has 6 cores at 3.1 GHz and an Apple GPU A14 GPU versus 8 cores at 2.8 GHz with Samsung Xclipse 920. In the 3DMark test, it scored 7592 points against 6902 , which is 10.00% higher.
It has a lower TDP of 6W (10W for its competitor), which means that devices based on this chip will heat up less during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modem in Samsung Exynos 2200 is better, 422 Mbps vs 314 Mbps so you'll get faster Internet service.
In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.
Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200 Benchmarks and Rankings
Benchmark | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Antutu | 665733 | 769446 | 15.58% |
Geekbench | 4211/1592 | 4288/1287 | 1.83% / 23.70% |
3Dmark | 7592 | 6902 | 10.00% |
Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200 Gaming Performance Test
Gaming test | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
PUBG: Mobile | 60 fps | 60 fps | - |
PUBG: New State | 60 fps | 60 fps | - |
Call of Duty: Mobile | 60 fps | 60 fps | - |
Fortnite | 60 fps | 30 fps | 100.00% |
Genshin Impact | 60 fps | 47 fps | 27.66% |
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 60 fps | 60 fps | - |
Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200 Specification
Processor name | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
---|---|---|
Release Date | 9/25/2020 | 15/1/2022 |
CPU Architecture | 2x Firestorm 3.1GHz + 4x Icestorm 1.8GHz | 1 x Cortex-X2 2.8 GHz + 3 x Cortex-A710 2,52 GHz + 4 x Cortex-A510 1,82 GHz |
Number of Cores | 6 | 8 |
Clock Rate | 3.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Chip technology | 5 nm | 4 nm |
GPU | Apple GPU A14 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
The highest TDP | 6 | 10 |
Memory | 6 Gb | 24 Gb |
Features | Apple modem | Samsung 5G modem |
Upload Speed (up to) | 314 Mbps | 422 Mbps |