Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 421856 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 5.65 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini: Xiaomi Poco F4 6/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 10 4/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 6/128GB - Compare |
347.51€ ($372.44) See Details |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 421856 score points which is 52.60% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 772 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 54.09% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2427 vs 1986 (22.21% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 52.60% faster in the Antutu test (145408 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 3500mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10T vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10S vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact