Samsung Exynos 9611 vs UNISOC Tiger T616
We compared the performance of processors and found out that Samsung Exynos 9611 is better than UNISOC Tiger T616 by 7.68%. It has 8 cores at 2.3 GHz and an Mali-G72MP GPU versus 8 cores at 2 GHz with Mali-G57MP. In the 3DMark test, it scored 778 points against 457 , which is 70.24% higher.
It has a lower TDP of 8W (10W for its competitor), which means that devices based on this chip will heat up less during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modems is identical (150 Mbps), so you won't notice a difference in your Internet connection.
In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs UNISOC Tiger T616 Benchmarks and Rankings
Benchmark | Samsung Exynos 9611 | UNISOC Tiger T616 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Antutu | 180933 | 227499 | 25.74% |
Geekbench | 1237/352 | 1397/381 | 12.93% / 8.24% |
3Dmark | 778 | 457 | 70.24% |
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs UNISOC Tiger T616 Gaming Performance Test
Gaming test | Samsung Exynos 9611 | UNISOC Tiger T616 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
PUBG: Mobile | 40 fps | 42 fps | 5.00% |
PUBG: New State | 33 fps | 35 fps | 6.06% |
Call of Duty: Mobile | 42 fps | 37 fps | 13.51% |
Fortnite | 16 fps | 17 fps | 6.25% |
Genshin Impact | 19 fps | 21 fps | 10.53% |
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 43 fps | 50 fps | 16.28% |
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs UNISOC Tiger T616 Specification
Processor name | Samsung Exynos 9611 | UNISOC Tiger T616 |
---|---|---|
Release Date | 9/10/2019 | 1/10/2021 |
CPU Architecture | 4 x ARM Cortex-A73 2,3 Ghz + 4 x ARM Cortex-A53 1,7 Ghz | 2 x Cortex-A75 2GHz + 6 x Cortex-A55 1.8GHz |
Number of Cores | 8 | 8 |
Clock Rate | 2.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
Chip technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
GPU | Mali-G72MP | Mali-G57MP |
The highest TDP | 8 | 10 |
Memory | 8 Gb | 6 Gb |
Features | Shannon 337 | Unisoc modem |
Upload Speed (up to) | 150 Mbps | 150 Mbps |