Compare Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Sharp Aquos R3
| Name | Xiaomi Mi CC11 | Sharp Aquos R3 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 505499 | 365833 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
| Diagonal size | 6.43 " | 6.2 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3120x1440 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 4360 mAh | 3200 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal |
| Weight | g | 185 g |
| Dimensions | mm | 156 x 74 x 8,9 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Mi CC11: Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 10C 4/128GB NFC - Compare Xiaomi Mi 10 12/256Gb - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Sharp models here
Alternatives to the Sharp Aquos R3: Sharp Aquos R2 Compact - Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 - Compare |
Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Sharp Aquos R3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Mi CC11’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R3’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 12Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Mi CC11 | Sharp Aquos R3 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Sharp Aquos R3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Sharp Aquos R3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Mi CC11 | Sharp Aquos R3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4360 mAh | 3200 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Sharp Aquos R3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Mi CC11 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 505499 score points which is 38.18% faster than the Sharp Aquos R3, which got 365833. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Sharp Aquos R3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Mi CC11 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 856 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R3 which got 681, it is 25.70% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2166 vs 2663 (-18.66% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Mi CC11 and Sharp Aquos R3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Mi CC11 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 38.18% faster in the Antutu test (139666 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 12Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 16Mp .
- More battery capacity: 4360mAh vs 3200mAh (a difference of 1160mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Mi CC11 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R3 (advantages)
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3120x1440 vs 2400x1080.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R3 (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Mi CC11 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi CC11
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G vs Xiaomi Mi CC11
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro vs Xiaomi Mi CC11
- Compare Xiaomi Mi CC11 vs Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3
Sharp Aquos R3 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare Blackview BV9600 Pro (Helio P60) vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare AGM X3 vs Sharp Aquos R3
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Doogee S70 vs Sharp Aquos R3